AT 11:45 WE HAD 412 VIEWS. THANKS LOYAL READERS AND GUESTS.

I WAS A LITTLE SURPRISED AT THE REALITIVE LOW READERSHIP TODAY. I MEAN AFTER ALL HOW MANY TIMES DO YOU CATCH THE MAYOR AND THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS BOTH LYING ABOUT THE SAME SUBJECT. AS YOU CAN SEE I’VE ASKED FOR PROOF THAT LOFTY SIGNED HIS FORM IN MAY AND NOT APRIL. I KID YOU NOT I ASKED THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS THE SPECIFIC QUESTION “WAS THIS FORM SIGNED BEFORE OR AFTER THE ELECTION CAUSE IF IT WAS PRIOR TO THE ELECTION IT WOULD PROVE A RIGGED ELECTION.” HER RESPONSE WAS IT WAS SIGNED BEFORE THE ELECTION.

WHEN THE WORD GOT OUT I RECEIVED AN APOLOGY E-MAIL THAT SAID SHE HAD CONFUSED THE DATES. IF YOU ASK A SPECIFIC QUESTION AND GET A SIMPLE ANSWER THAT’S ALL I NEED. MS. HUTTO IS EITHER LYING HER ASS OFF NOW OR WHEN I ASKED THE QUESTION. IT IS THAT SIMPLE.

DID SHE, HUTTO, TALK TO LOFTY BETWEEN 3:00 AND 4:45? IF SO I’D LOVE TO HEAR THAT CONVERSATION, IF IT TOOK PLACE AT ALL. I SUSPECT PAM OR STACY CALLED HUTTO WHEN I TOLD THEM ABOUT THE PROBLEM AT APPROXIMATELY 2:45 AND IT TOOK THEM, PAM, STACY AND HUTTO, AN HOUR TO COME UP WITH THE “STORY” ABOUT GETTING THE DATES WRONG. AT 3:45 I GOT THE APOLOGY E-MAIL FROM HUTTO. I’LL BET THAT LOFTY DIDN’T EVEN GO INTO THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS OFFICE ON 5/4/2018. WHY SHOULD HE WHEN HE WENT IN ON 4/4/2018, JUST LIKE HIS AFFIDAVIT SAYS HE DID. TWO SEPERATE DISTINCT FACTS, BOTH CAN NOT BE TRUE AT THE SAME TIME, WHICH ONE TO BELIEVE? SOMEBODY IS LYING HERE AND MY MONEY IS ON LAURA HUTTO BECAUSE I KNOW WHITE SPRINGS IS CORRUPT. I EXPECT MORE FROM A CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICER BUT AM APPARENTLY NOT GOING TO GET IT.

BACK TO WHAT’S IMPORTANT. 416 VIEWS, A GOOD IF NOT A GREAT DAY.

One Reply to “AT 11:45 WE HAD 412 VIEWS. THANKS LOYAL READERS AND GUESTS.”

Leave a Reply