The Town in accordance with Florida Law still has to provide the names of firefighters for the Town of White Springs – all other information as shown below is exempt

Our attempts to get the names of the firefighters on the roster has been virtually nil since Pam Tomlinson is agreeing with Federal Law which Attorney Hatton found.  However, it is known that if the State has a law in place regarding such, the Federal Law is trumped.  Federal law only applies, in the event the State does not have a law relating to this exemption.  So here is the State Law under Chapter 119 relating to EXEMPTIONS:

 

So even though we previously were provided rosters of our firefighters’ NAMES even though such information was fictitious after Kevin Pittman resigned, there is no law saying the NAMES of Firefighters may not be provided only that the names, etal of their spouses, or where they are employed or the names of their children and the schools the children are attending may not be given.  See below.

 

d. The home addresses, telephone numbers, dates of birth, and photographs of current or former firefighters certified in compliance with s. 633.408; the names, home addresses, telephone numbers, photographs, dates of birth, and places of employment of the spouses and children of such firefighters; and the names and locations of schools and day care facilities attended by the children of such firefighters are exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution. This sub-subparagraph is subject to the Open Government Sunset Review Act in accordance with s. 119.15, and shall stand repealed on October 2, 2022, unless reviewed and saved from repeal through reenactment by the Legislature.

(b) An exemption may be created, revised, or maintained only if it serves an identifiable public purpose, and the exemption may be no broader than is necessary to meet the public purpose it serves. An identifiable public purpose is served if the exemption meets one of the following purposes and the Legislature finds that the purpose is sufficiently compelling to override the strong public policy of open government and cannot be accomplished without the exemption:

1. Allows the state or its political subdivisions to effectively and efficiently administer a governmental program, which administration would be significantly impaired without the exemption;
2. Protects information of a sensitive personal nature concerning individuals, the release of which information would be defamatory to such individuals or cause unwarranted damage to the good name or reputation of such individuals or would jeopardize the safety of such individuals. However, in exemptions under this subparagraph, only information that would identify the individuals may be exempted; or
3. Protects information of a confidential nature concerning entities, including, but not limited to, a formula, pattern, device, combination of devices, or compilation of information which is used to protect or further a business advantage over those who do not know or use it, the disclosure of which information would injure the affected entity in the marketplace.
(7) Records made before the date of a repeal of an exemption under this section may not be made public unless otherwise provided by law. In deciding whether the records shall be made public, the Legislature shall consider whether the damage or loss to persons or entities uniquely affected by the exemption of the type specified in subparagraph (6)(b)2. or subparagraph (6)(b)3. would occur if the records were made public.
Karin for the blog

Leave a Reply